4 Research Report
Overview
This three-week unit will lead you through specific steps of the research process so you can investigate and discover more about an issue. With your classmates, you’ll practice this process in a purposeful way that will help you be focused and open-minded. This unit is just about the research: focus on your sources first, and resist the urge to take a stance. In the end, you’ll be ready to move onto other argumentative projects, so hold that thought.
Course objectives
This assignment meets the following CO1 course objectives:
- Use sources and evidence
- Develop rhetorical knowledge
- Develop application of composing conventions
- Develop application of composing conventions
Module objectives
During the process of completing this assignment, writers will:
- Select appropriate evidence and consider its relevance
- Read, annotate, and analyze texts in at least one genre of academic discourse
- Use appropriate vocabulary, format, and documentation
- Apply formal conventions of writing, including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices, in an annotated bibliography
Research Report
Research can take many forms in academic writing. The purpose, however, remains the same: to gather sources, summarize, and evaluate them. These notes are a tool for individual researchers to keep track of their own research and thinking; however, when shared within a writing community, it becomes valuable tool for many researchers and allows researchers to more critically approach sources.
Purpose:
This project focuses on investigating an issue, continuing your ability to summarize sources and analyze their credibility and relevance. You will choose an issue within the guidelines of the course theme that you are most interested in researching, pursue an individual inquiry question, and explore the research that begins to answer your question.
Audience
For this assignment, your primary audience will be yourself. You’re creating a resource, a tool, for your future self. This assignment will eventually be useful to make an argument, though your instructor and your classmates will also benefit from and view your work.
Requirements
Research can take many forms, and this assignment will focus on your process as you explore, collect, and evaluate sources while remaining neutral. Collecting information from different perspectives is crucial to a thorough investigation, so one source will be a scholarly source and the other will be a popular source. This assignment will consist of three sections:
- Introduction: In around one paragraph (4-6 sentences), describe your research process, addressing:
- Why did you select this issue?
- What did you know about the issue before you started your research? What personal experience (if any) do you have with the topic or issue?
- Present your inquiry question in the form of a question.
- Research: For each source, introduce the source with a complete and accurate citation in MLA. Follow the citation by presenting:
- Article Thesis: Explain the main idea of the text, identifying the purpose and audience.
- Key points: Practice summary by identifying key points of the text, using at least one quote to capture the main ideas. Pay close attention to author tags and in-text citation.
- Evaluate: Explain what makes the source trustworthy, as well as why you may be skeptical about the source.
- Discussion of Significance: Review why your research is relevant to your inquiry by showing how it answers the research question. In a few paragraphs, discuss:
- How are the articles similar? In what ways do they work together?
- In what ways are the articles opposing? What discrepancies did you find in your research? Where do these disagreements come from? How can they be explained or resolved?
- What information is missing? How can you better respond to your inquiry question to provide a more complete answer?
- Why is this research important in the discussion about your issue? How could these sources contribute to an argument (e.g. present one position, present multiple sides of an argument, give background information, motivate and encourage action, etc.)?
Formatting:
- Reports should be between 750-1,000 words (around 3-4 pages), following the prompts for length within each section.
- Your tone and voice should be appropriate for an academic audience. Your writing should be carefully proofread and grammatically correct.
- Your work must be typed in size 12, Times New Roman font and double spaced, 1” margins, following MLA requirements.
Week 1: Research-Based Inquiry
Research begins with a question you want to answer. In academia, this process is generally referred to as inquiry and invites a range of answers and perspectives. These points of view are illustrated in a variety of sources, which can be identified as either scholarly or popular. This week, we’ll navigate the research process and your instructor will place you in a group based on your interest.
Research and Inquiry
We perform research every day, which we can define as collecting information to study and draw conclusions. Whether we’re comparing prices for a big purchase, finding a new restaurant to try, or looking up the bus route to a friend’s house, each of these processes starts with a question and the need for a specific solution. In academia, this process is a little more developed. First, we’ll start with inquiry. We can define inquiry as an investigation to ask narrow and refined questions to develop knowledge and ideas about an issue. This process invites a complicated range of answers and perspectives, and the goal is to remain neutral and discover conflicts, rather than finding a quick answer and moving on. By starting with a strong, open-ended inquiry question, you can help ensure that your research will be well-rounded and complete.
As you begin your inquiry, you have to first decide what you’ll investigate. Your class may have a theme or specific area of focus, so within those limitations, you can identify a topic, or a broad category of interest. Generally, these are big, neutral categories like “education” or “athletics.” They begin to define what you’re interested in. Within a topic, you can begin to define issues, which may be more controversial or have multiple sides. For example, within education, issues include the cost of college education, or the use of standardized tests in K-12. Each of these spark specific discussions with evidence for and against that make these issues complicated and engaging.
Recency and Relevance
When thinking about issues, the relevance and recency of the issue is also important. For example, standardized tests may have been really important for you to get to college, but they aren’t used as often during college courses. This means that standardized tests may be less relevant to college students; however, if you’re studying education or have children who are taking these tests, then this issue is likely to be more relevant to you!
With recency, you should consider timing. Some issues have been resolved or were more popular a decade ago. Other issues might be so new that we haven’t had time to study them yet. While you don’t have to choose something from the front page of the newspaper, considering the timeline of your issue will help you find a more engaging issue.
Checking In: Questions and Activities
Answering the questions below will help you develop and focus the Introduction of your project, exploring your interests, why this issue is important, and how to transition from your brainstorming, to a topic, and then to your specific issue.
- Brainstorm some topics and issues you may be interested in researching. It will be helpful to find a balance of an issue that concerns you and that you want to learn more about, but not something you feel strongly about or have argued about before. If you feel as if you already have all the answers, you won’t be able to complete this process and it makes your job of representing all the sides much harder! The issue you choose must also be relevant so that you can find appropriate research to help your investigation. Consider:
- RELEVANCE: Who does this issue affect? Who cares about this, and in what ways is this issue still affecting people? Does the issue have multiple perspectives? Would people take different positions on this?
- RECENCY: Has this situation changed recently? Did we recently learn something new? Have people changed their minds?
Week 2: Evaluating Sources
Now that we’re familiar with the research process, it’s time to dig in and find some sources. Using the reading skills we’ve been building this semester, you’ll review and select the best sources to answer your research question. Remember, we don’t know much yet, so maintain a neutral stance throughout your investigation!
Conducting Research
Additionally, the research process is complicated, so you may still need to make adjustments to your issue — what if you can’t find enough information, or your idea is still too broad or narrow? Through the research process, you’ll be able to decide, with the help of your classmates, instructor, and university librarians, you can adjust your issue to make sure you can find enough evidence to complete your investigation.
During your research, you’ll need to represent multiple points of view by reviewing and citing a variety of sources. Broadly speaking, sources can be categorized as popular or scholarly.
Popular Sources
We interact with popular sources every day. The articles linked in your social media feeds, the magazines at the grocery store checkout, and the evening news are all considered popular sources. To identify a popular source, these are some common, rhetorical characteristics:
- Author: journalists and editors
- Audience: written for large, general groups of people; not always specified
- Genres: magazine articles (e.g. interviews), newspapers (e.g. editorials), and many books
- Include photos, are shorter in length, more easily understood, often persuasive
Popular sources are great tools to learn about a topic quickly and are published daily. This means you can find information on brand new topics and current events, and there will be a variety of publications on the topic that draw varying or contradictory conclusions. This helps diversify your research and learn more very quickly.
However, because these sources are written so quickly, may be based on opinion, and sold or make profits from clicks and views, they’re not as trustworthy. Writers who produce popular sources are often not specialists or authorities in the field; instead, they report on and make sense of daily events, significant studies from experts, or try to persuade readers to adopt their points of view.
Scholarly Sources
To access scholarly sources — also known as peer-reviewed or refereed sources, or even journals — you’ll likely need to use your university library. These journals typically require subscriptions and special access, which universities typically pay for with your student fees. Once you’ve accessed your university’s subscriptions, you’ll have access to hundreds, if not thousands, of journals on specific topics within your major and everything else. You can likely tell by looking that you’re reviewing a peer-reviewed source from these rhetorical characteristics:
- Author: often multiple authors, hold advanced degrees, lists what university the author works with
- Audience: written for others in this specific field, readers need understanding of the jargon, or specialized vocabulary
- Include long reference lists at the end, often uses tables and graphs to communicate data, longer texts with sections such as: abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion
These texts are much more complicated and sophisticated, so be patient as you read. A good first step — before you try to read the entire text! — is to focus on the first paragraph, which may be titled as the abstract. This paragraph summarizes the entire article, explaining the end result. Unlike popular sources that may try to keep you guessing, the purpose of scholarly sources is to present the findings. If you read the abstract and the article seems like a good fit for your research, download or save it to read more closely. If not, try your search again! Once you have a few or several scholarly texts that seem like a good fit and you’ve evaluated their credibility (explained below), prioritize your reading and start with the text that’s the best fit for your research question. Throughout the sections of scholarly texts, the most relevant information will come from the Discussion and Conclusion sections. While the other sections provide context and specific details on how the research was completed, you’ll focus most closely on the Discussion and Conclusion, where the authors will explain their significant findings and why this new information is so important.
If you’re having trouble finding appropriate sources, this may mean that you need to adjust your topic. You may have too narrow of a search. Or, you may just need to revise your search terms. Unlike Google, where you can type in a complete question and find answers, scholarly search engines are very particular about your searches. Consider your key words again, consult your instructor and librarian for assistance, and make adjustments as needed.
Evaluating Sources
Once you have some sources, it will help to verify their credibility. This will save you time and help make sure you’re using the most trustworthy and relevant information in your research. When deciding to use a source, there are some specific characteristics that we can review and evaluate to prove whether or not the source is ultimately trustworthy:
- Author: What experience (time working in the field, lived experience, etc.) or expertise (degrees, awards, other publications, etc.) does the author have?
- Evidence: Where does information in the text come from? Are other sources cited?
- Bias: Is the author objective? Do they have something to gain or lose in the issue? Do they represent and explain both their point of view and others’?
- Timeliness: Is the article recent and relevant? Are the sources recent and relevant?
If your source passes all or most of these checks, you likely have a credible source! It’s okay to have some questions and to challenge the information, but if your source fails more than one of these tests, you’ll likely want a different, more credible and reliable source. This skepticism will improve your research and get you thinking critically about where the information comes from, who’s behind it all, and why they’re writing.
This assignment requires one popular source and one scholarly source, so keep this in mind as you evaluate and critique your sources. Make sure that they work together well, focusing on the same issue, and are credible and reliable.
Research Rough Drafts
This week, you’ll submit your Introduction and at least one Research entry for your instructor’s review. You should have drafts of these pieces so far, and the feedback you will receive will help with your revisions, as well as prepare you for the Discussion section.
Review the prompts for each section and review your work to make sure you answer each question thoroughly.
- Introduction: In one complete paragraph (4-6 sentences), explain:
- Why did you select this issue?
- What did you know about the issue before you started your research? What personal experience (if any) do you have with the topic or issue?
- Present your inquiry question in the form of a question.
- Research: These entries will be almost a page long, including the citation, thesis, key points, and evaluation. Below, the prompt and additional notes are included to help you complete each section for at least one source. Remember, both the popular and scholarly sections will be around the same length. You may revisit the Academic Summary or Academic Summary & Response Modules for notes on these sections.
- MLA Citation: Introduce the source with a complete and accurate citation in MLA. Use the library’s resources or consult Purdue OWL for information on citation.
- Article Thesis (1-2 sentences): Explain the main idea of the text, identifying the purpose and audience.
- Key Points (3-4 sentences): Practice summary by identifying key points of the text, using at least one quote to capture the main ideas. Pay close attention to author tags and in-text citation.
- Evaluate (2-3 sentences): Explain what makes the source trustworthy, as well as why you may be skeptical about the source. If you’re including the source, you should ultimately trust the information and include more reasons to believe the text than to criticize it.
Checking In: Questions and Activities
- Once you have your sources, you’ll be able to complete the Research section of this project. These each have multiple pieces, including the MLA citation, summary (thesis and key points), and evaluation. Review the summary units to make sure you can write a strong key point summary to represent your research clearly and fairly in the Research section.
Week 3: Analyzing and Applying Research
Your research is coming together! This week, you’ll continue to closely and critically read your sources as you complete your draft. This week focuses on the Discussion. Similar to your scholarly sources, this is the chance for you to make sense of what your research is saying. It’s time to answer the research question.
Analyzing Research
So far, you’ve drafted the Introduction to your research, and completed the Research section to report on what your sources say and why they’re trustworthy. Now, you can analyze these ideas to answer your research question. An important part of research is to make connections between your sources, so consider how your sources agree and disagree with each other. If there are still questions about the issue, what information is missing? Asking all of these questions will help you draw conclusions from the two sources you have, as well as continue planning your research. Just like your scholarly articles that outline the next steps of the research process, you want to think ahead about what comes next so you can strengthen your ideas and anticipate the arguments on this issue.
This is your chance to make sense of your sources and show why they’ll be important for your group to use. Your Research section began to summarize and evaluate sources, and now you can illustrate why these resources matter. You’ve done all the background work you can do, and it’s time to take the last step of the Conversation Model and make a contribution, based on the information you’ve found.
Throughout this project, you’ve listened in the Introduction by checking in with yourself and explaining how you arrived at your issue. Your Research forced you to ask questions and learn more about the issue, exploring multiple angles and forms of evidence. Now, as you draft the Discussion, you get to make a contribution by showing the connections and creating something new out of the evidence you’ve accumulated. By completing this portion and outlining the answer to your inquiry question, you’ve completed the research cycle.
At the top of your draft, identify two concerns you have about your work. What would you like your peers to pay attention to as they review your work? To complete this peer review, respond to each prompt fully while making comments on your peer’s draft.
- Introduction:
- Explain why your peer is interested in the issue
- Identify your peer’s previous knowledge or experience with the issue
- Restate the research question
- Does the question match the group’s goals for the project?
- Research: Fill in the blanks for the rhetorical information and continue providing feedback for the other prompts.
- Author:
- Genre (text):
- Purpose (NOT “to inform”):
- Audience:
- 2-3 key points: Do you have a clear sense of what this article is about?
- Key points are relevant to the research question
- Evaluation of credibility: Is the source trustworthy?
- Discussion:
- The sources are compared to show similarities
- The sources are contrasted to show differences
- Next steps of research are explained
- Importance of the issue is reviewed, showing why this must continue to be researched
- Overall: What additional comments do you have for your peer? Summarize their current strengths and the areas they should continue to focus on most
An “A” (excellent) research project (90% +):
- The sources are highly relevant and recent (no older than 5 years), providing a particular perspective on the issue you are researching and providing substantial evidence that helps answer your inquiry question. Research contributes to the group understanding of the issue fully.
- The introduction contextualizes the project and identifies the personal connection to the issue. A developed, open-ended research question guides the project and reflects the group’s goals. The conclusion provides a strong answer or perspective on the research question including the significance of the findings. Different perspectives are accounted for and missing information is acknowledged.
- The research accurately and objectively summarizes the source. Complete rhetorical information and relevant key points are presented. The research effectively evaluates the source’s credibility, authority
- Proper attribution or in-text citations are used. A balance of paraphrasing and carefully chosen direct quotations is also present, including page numbers when available. Quotes are smoothly incorporated
- will be clear and readable without distracting grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
A “B” (good) research project (80% +):
- Will accomplish the goals of the assignment but may have one or two of the following issues:
- The sources may not meet requirements, and may be of questionable quality, providing limited perspectives on the issue you are researching. The article may lack development or substantial evidence. Research is useful to others but may be repetitive or limited in places.
- The introduction may be missing information to provide context. The connection or interest to the issue could be further explained. The research question is not clearly connected to the group or research. The discussion may summarize the research rather than explain the significance of the findings, leaving questions about the research or conclusion. The importance of the issue may be unclear or different perspectives are not accounted for
- The summary desires development, and may only rely on a single section of the source. Rhetorical information may be missing, or key points are not clearly communicated. Summary may contain some details or irrelevant information. The evaluation may be underdeveloped, reviewing too few reasons to prove credibility. Or, the evaluation may not develop an explanation to show the credibility effectively.
- Attribution or in-text citation may need to be used more frequently to keep ideas accounted for. Summary and evaluative work could better balance quotes and paraphrases or quotes could be better chosen or more smoothly incorporated. Page numbers may be missing in places
- The writer may need to work on communicating information more effectively. The sections will be generally clear and readable but may need further editing for grammatical errors.
A “C” (satisfactory) research project (70% +):
- Will discuss literacy for an academic audience with examples and explanation of significance but may have more than two of the following issues:
- Sources don’t meet requirements or lack substantial evidence. Research is repetitive or limited.
- The introduction does not provide context for the reader or is missing an inquiry question. The discussion is lacking because it does not explain the significance of the findings. The importance of the issue or an answer is not offered.
- The research section provides a vague or overly detailed summary. Rhetorical information is missing and does not capture the content of the source accurately. The evaluation does not focus on credibility. Opinion is included.
- Attribution is missing or unclear in places. Quoting and paraphrasing are incorrectly done or are missing context. Page numbers are not included.
- “C” work may also need more editing for readability.
A “D” (poor) research project (60% +):
- Will show an attempt toward the assignment goals that has fallen short.
- The research is not high quality. It may be a tertiary source (e.g. an encyclopedia entry) rather than a secondary or primary source that illuminates a particular perspective or argument on the issue. The source may provide little evidence or have a disproportionate image to text ratio. Research does not contribute to the group’s understanding of the issue.
- The introduction does not offer context for the issue, missing personal background on the issue or research process. The discussion may be inadequate to provide information about the inquiry question or perspectives addressed throughout the articles. The research question is not answered. The future of the research project is not addressed. The issue is not significant or the importance is not explained.
- Summary is not developed, or provides too many details to be useful in future research. The evaluation does not prove the source’s credibility, either leaving out an explanation or providing irrelevant reasons for credibility
- Attribution is weak because it is unclear which ideas are yours and which are the authors. Quotes are ineffectively chosen or inappropriate for the scope of the assignment (e.g. too long). Quotes may be “free floating” without proper contextualizing. Page numbers are not included.
An “F” (failing) summary:
- ignores the assignment.
- has been plagiarized.
Checking In: Questions and Activities
- The assignment sheet offers several prompts for this section of the assignment. Take some time to brainstorm and take some notes to answer these questions. Brainstorming through each of these questions can show which areas you know a lot about already, and which sections you may need to spend more time with. If you get stuck, you also still have time to talk with your instructor or share ideas with your peers before you complete your final draft!
This module is intended to take 3 weeks and would work well after any summary assignment and before introducing argument. With rhetorical arguments focusing on sources and research, it’s necessary to introduce students to the research process first. This is the first unit where students will interact with the university’s databases, not only in this course but perhaps in their university career; the range of experience in research is therefore vast and you may benefit from class sessions in the library, or inviting librarians to your classroom as guest speakers to help with this process.
This assignment requires some guidance from the instructor, specifically if grouping students and ensuring that they have a well-designed research question to guide their investigations. This allows you to unite students with similarly themed interests and this model research question should serve as a strong example for students when conducting research in the future.
In groups, it is essential that students all select different articles. This process is designed to illustrate how this genre could be useful in other disciplines, as well as model the research process more authentically as they read and provide notes on sources for each other.
Assessment Notes
Confusion may occur with this assignment since students are not producing a traditional essay. In the past, students have had trouble understanding that the research they’re reporting on and assessing IS the final assignment.
This assignment is purposely structured to have different purposes within each section of the final assignment. The introduction is meant to allow students “to focus” their ideas, while the research section is meant for students “to report” on their sources. Lastly, the discussion section encourages them “to apply” or “to analyze” their selections, moving them toward making an informed argument.
to collect and study information to draw conclusions
an investigation to ask narrow and refined questions to help develop knowledge and ideas about an issue.